THE LEEPER ARCHIVE
Archive 002 / Chapter 16 / Current canon
Revised · 28 September 2026

The Second Graham

The feed answers questions and carries an accepted principal reference; the source tests establish constructed memory, not the identity or operator behind it.

Read revised chapterRead 26 September canon studyDownload structured canon

Evidence basis. These findings cite the current novel by paragraph. The earlier canon study remains available as a dated record of the first edition. Some identities, motives and claimed authorities remain unresolved in the story.

What changed / what remains open

  1. The revised prose combines the two source tests into one tighter evidentiary arc. The finding is constructed autobiography, with authorship still open. ¶91 ¶210 ¶213
  2. Recognition by inherited machinery is logged separately from consent and lawful authority. ¶260 ¶263 ¶268

People, places and evidence

Character · A2-CHAR-ELIZA

Eliza Marr

Compares the feed with earlier and later records, publishes bounded findings about the two memory claims, and keeps the response mechanism unresolved.

Visual cue: Archival comparison sheets beside the live feed.

Evidence ¶59 ¶91 ¶192 ¶210 ¶213 ¶297

Character · A2-CHAR-PERA

Pera Sol

Records different receiver timings at the market booth, marks the later public time, and keeps source comparisons visible beside Eliza.

Visual cue: Booth clocks and source copies.

Evidence ¶1 ¶2 ¶182 ¶224

Character · A2-CHAR-DARAN

Daran Pell

Finds the separate Isbister sketchbook note and helps compare it with Graham’s account; rereads the later erroneous catalogue against the sketch.

Visual cue: Separate pages with conflicting descriptions.

Evidence ¶59 ¶70 ¶81 ¶193

Character · A2-CHAR-ARUN

Arun Vey

Tests inherited display and service routes, isolates five routes without immediate service loss, and logs differing local responses to reactivation requests.

Visual cue: Working route board and local switches.

Evidence ¶104 ¶108 ¶140 ¶260

Character · A2-CHAR-NARA

Nara Venn

Challenges the appeal of relief through one speaker and asks why coordination should depend on the speaker’s name.

Visual cue: Mandate hooks beside a public screen.

Evidence ¶276 ¶277 ¶281 ¶284

Character · A2-CHAR-MARIAN

Marian Vale

Refuses to recognise the feed’s authority over herself, the estate question, or disputed public-use property; she makes no claim that the likeness is false.

Visual cue: Succession notice held beside the live image.

Evidence ¶158 ¶167

Event · A2-EVENT-RESPONSIVE-FEED

The Responsive Graham Feed

A Graham likeness answers live questions through differently delayed routes and speaks in the first person; responsiveness does not authenticate the speaker.

Visual cue: Multiple ordinary receivers, not one central transmitter.

Evidence ¶1 ¶2 ¶208 ¶217

Records · A2-OBJ-SOURCE-TESTS

The Two Source Comparisons

The feed repeats Isbister-only detail and a later catalogue’s nonexistent bell tower as autobiographical memory. The second finding supports constructed autobiography, while leaving the operator unknown.

Visual cue: The actual sketch, erroneous caption and comparison columns.

Evidence ¶70 ¶81 ¶91 ¶192 ¶193 ¶208 ¶210 ¶213

Infrastructure · A2-OBJ-LEGACY-ROUTES

Legacy Authority Routes

Inherited service and broadcast paths carry the feed and reactivation proposals; local systems accept, hold or reject requests differently.

Visual cue: Route board showing local outcomes.

Evidence ¶108 ¶129 ¶140 ¶233 ¶260

Record · A2-OBJ-PRINCIPAL-RECOGNISED

Principal Recognised

A machine log accepts a principal reference pointing to an old Council identity service. The entry establishes machine recognition, not a person’s identity or lawful command.

Visual cue: Raw acceptance log beside the physical route.

Evidence ¶260 ¶263 ¶268 ¶301

Continuity boundaries

  1. First-person responsiveness and different receiver timings do not authenticate identity. ¶1 ¶2 ¶91
  2. The Isbister test is evidence of composition from surviving sources; it does not identify every available source or the operator. ¶70 ¶81 ¶91
  3. The later bell-tower error establishes a constructed autobiographical response without settling whether the system is autonomous or human-operated. ¶192 ¶193 ¶208 ¶210 ¶213
  4. Marian rejects the feed’s claimed authority without deciding whether the likeness is false. ¶158 ¶167
  5. Some legacy routes remain connected for service reasons and local reactivation responses vary. ¶140 ¶233 ¶260
  6. PRINCIPAL RECOGNISED is a machine acceptance log and leads to the Council identity service; its authority must be investigated next. ¶263 ¶268 ¶301

Companion records

Game design candidates

Untested ideas. Costs, rarity, timing and rules have not been approved; this canon update does not change the live game.

Figure · Knowledge

Eliza Marr, Test the Sources

Compare a presented memory with source records; expose provenance without declaring a speaker’s identity.

Based on A2-CHAR-ELIZA, A2-OBJ-SOURCE-TESTS

Figure · Infrastructure

Arun Vey, Route Isolation

Isolate a selected inherited route at a visible service cost.

Based on A2-CHAR-ARUN, A2-OBJ-LEGACY-ROUTES