Eliza Marr
Compares the feed with earlier and later records, publishes bounded findings about the two memory claims, and keeps the response mechanism unresolved.
Visual cue: Archival comparison sheets beside the live feed.
Current R5 chapter text. Archived R4 canon.
The feed answers questions and carries an accepted principal reference; the source tests establish constructed memory, not the identity or operator behind it.
Evidence basis. These findings cite the current novel by paragraph. The earlier canon study remains available as a dated record of the first edition. Some identities, motives and claimed authorities remain unresolved in the story.
Compares the feed with earlier and later records, publishes bounded findings about the two memory claims, and keeps the response mechanism unresolved.
Visual cue: Archival comparison sheets beside the live feed.
Records different receiver timings at the market booth, marks the later public time, and keeps source comparisons visible beside Eliza.
Visual cue: Booth clocks and source copies.
Finds the separate Isbister sketchbook note and helps compare it with Graham’s account; rereads the later erroneous catalogue against the sketch.
Visual cue: Separate pages with conflicting descriptions.
Tests inherited display and service routes, isolates five routes without immediate service loss, and logs differing local responses to reactivation requests.
Visual cue: Working route board and local switches.
Challenges the appeal of relief through one speaker and asks why coordination should depend on the speaker’s name.
Visual cue: Mandate hooks beside a public screen.
Refuses to recognise the feed’s authority over herself, the estate question, or disputed public-use property; she makes no claim that the likeness is false.
Visual cue: Succession notice held beside the live image.
A Graham likeness answers live questions through differently delayed routes and speaks in the first person; responsiveness does not authenticate the speaker.
Visual cue: Multiple ordinary receivers, not one central transmitter.
The feed repeats Isbister-only detail and a later catalogue’s nonexistent bell tower as autobiographical memory. The second finding supports constructed autobiography, while leaving the operator unknown.
Visual cue: The actual sketch, erroneous caption and comparison columns.
Inherited service and broadcast paths carry the feed and reactivation proposals; local systems accept, hold or reject requests differently.
Visual cue: Route board showing local outcomes.
A machine log accepts a principal reference pointing to an old Council identity service. The entry establishes machine recognition, not a person’s identity or lawful command.
Visual cue: Raw acceptance log beside the physical route.
A responsive Graham presentation travels inherited routes and receives machine recognition; its identity and operator remain undetermined.
The feed uses Isbister’s separate note and a later catalogue error as first-person recollection; the archive documents source composition.
Untested ideas. Costs, rarity, timing and rules have not been approved; this canon update does not change the live game.
Compare a presented memory with source records; expose provenance without declaring a speaker’s identity.
Based on A2-CHAR-ELIZA, A2-OBJ-SOURCE-TESTS
Isolate a selected inherited route at a visible service cost.
Based on A2-CHAR-ARUN, A2-OBJ-LEGACY-ROUTES